Sixminute vs TimeSolv at a glance
| Decision factor | Sixminute | TimeSolv | Choose based on |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary product | Automatic time capture | Legal time and billing | Project scope |
| Native capture | Work across device applications | Timers and entered activity | Need for automatic reconstruction |
| Entry creation | Complete entries, ready to review | Timers, manual entry, abbreviations and voice-to-text | Timekeeper habits |
| Matter matching | Inferred from work context | Selected when recording or entering time | Required automation |
| Narratives | Generated automatically | Written, dictated or reused with abbreviations | Narrative effort |
| Mobile and offline work | Not a mobile billing platform | iOS, Android and offline entry | Work away from the desk |
| Billing controls | Enforcement planned | Approvals, budgets, rates, UTBMS and LEDES | Controls required today |
| Wider workflow | Releases to the existing PMS | Invoicing, payments, trust accounting and reporting | Existing software stack |
| Integrations | Connector built during onboarding | Published accounting, payment, document and Microsoft integrations | Connector availability |
| Public pricing | Not published | From USD 49 per user per month | Proposal and included scope |
Where Sixminute is stronger
Sixminute is stronger when the problem begins before time entry. Lawyers move between documents, research, correspondence and calls without starting a timer for every task. Sixminute groups work across applications by task, identifies the likely client and matter, calculates the duration and writes a client-ready narrative.
The lawyer reviews a completed day rather than relying on timers they had to remember to start. This matters when the goal is recovering work that would otherwise never reach the timesheet.
Sixminute works on top of the firm’s current PMS. The required connector is built during onboarding, so better capture does not require replacing the billing workflow. Activity is prepared on the device, with processing agreed for the client environment.
Billing-rule enforcement is planned. Firms needing mature billing controls immediately should account for that limitation.
Where TimeSolv is stronger
TimeSolv is the more complete legal billing product. It combines time and expense tracking with approvals, matter budgets, flexible rates, split billing, invoicing, payments, trust accounting and reporting. It also supports UTBMS task codes and several LEDES formats.
TimeSolv is stronger away from the desk. Its mobile apps run on iOS and Android, while TimeSync works on Mac and Windows. Lawyers can use timers, enter time manually, dictate descriptions and work offline.
TimeSolv publishes integrations with Microsoft 365, QuickBooks, Xero, NetDocuments, Dropbox and LawPay. Its PointOne integration adds automatic activity reconstruction and sends completed entries into TimeSolv. That is an additional product relationship, not TimeSolv’s native timer workflow.
TimeSolv publishes a starting price of USD 49 per user per month, offers volume pricing and advertises a 10-day free trial. Sixminute does not publish standard pricing.
Which should your firm choose?
Choose Sixminute when missed billable work is the main problem and the firm wants automatic reconstruction without changing its PMS. Measure recovered hours, matter accuracy, narrative edits and review time during a pilot.
Choose TimeSolv to consolidate time entry, invoicing, payments, trust accounting, reporting and mobile workflows. If automatic reconstruction is also required, include its PointOne integration in the comparison.
The decision is whether the firm needs better capture, a new billing platform, or both.
For automatic time capture that works with the firm’s existing systems, explore Sixminute.
